Mario Nawfal

BILL GATES TRIES TO DESTROY ELON THEN ASKS FOR MONEY Gates was angry with Musk for his skepticism regarding extreme Covid measures, so he shorted Tesla to try to bankrupt it. Coincidence? This selling pressure occurred at Tesla’s weakest time, in the midst of Covid. Bill Gates would have profited if Tesla went bankrupt. WHAT HAPPENED: - July 2020: Gates criticized Musk for downplaying the severity of Covid and (rightly) criticizing stay-at-home orders: "[Elon’s] not heavily involved in vaccines. He excels in electric cars and rockets. ... I hope he doesn't overstep in areas outside his expertise" (the irony of a software company CEO discussing the virus). - 2020: That same year, Gates started shorting Tesla - March 2022: Gates had the audacity to approach Musk to discuss philanthropy and climate issues, hoping for a donation after Musk donated $5.7 billion in Telsta stock to a charity. - April 2022: Musk obviously declined Gates' request, citing Gates' $500m short position against Tesla as the reason. - April 2022: Gates admits to still be shorting Tesla, despite asking Musk for money! I’m not making this up! 😂 - Today: Elon clarified his stance on Gates: “Gates placed a massive bet on Tesla dying when our company was at one of its weakest moments.” He believes Gates “still has that massive bet against Tesla on the table.. aiming to make $500M from Tesla’s demise.” Calling Gate’s charities, “window-dressing environmental causes.” IN MY OPINION, Gates' actions are unethical to say the least. He claims to care about the environment while shorting the world's most successful electric vehicle company. He suggests that @elonmusk should not discuss vaccines and COVID-19 due to a lack of qualifications, yet he himself opines on the topic without appropriate expertise. Gates' decision to short Tesla, nearly driving it to bankruptcy, and then asking for a donation seems contradictory and questionable. Was Gates trying to bankrupt Elon due to his Covid stance?

BIDEN CAUGHT LYING ABOUT 9/11? Joe Biden lies about being at Ground Zero the day after 9/11 when he was really in DC! “Never Forget! Ground Zero in New York. I remember standing there the next day, felt like I was looking through the gates of hell" Lying, dementia, or slip up?

BREAKING: NEW COVID VACCINE APPROVED | SPIKE IN COVID CASES | NEW LOCKDOWN? The FDA has given the green light to new Pfizer and Moderna vaccines specifically designed to tackle the Omicron variant XBB.1.5. This comes amidst reports of a spike in COVID-19 cases. Data this week: - New cases: 252,903 - Hospitalized: 11,558 - In ICU: 1,577 - Deaths: 803 With Covid cases spiking in September, and the introduction of a new booster vaccine, there are concerns that this winter may see a large increase in cases and possibly lead to major restrictions. Given that this issue has become heavily politicized, implementing any form of lockdown (although unlikely) will be challenging. Once the CDC approves this vaccine, the Biden administration plans to encourage the public to receive both the Covid and flu shots. Will you take the new vaccines? Are you willing to adhere to mask mandates or accept new lockdown measures?

ELON KILLING TWITTER? Walter Isaacson admitted he “thought Elon would blow Twitter up,” but realized over time that it’s “turning into 𝕏, which is what [Elon] always wanted.” Walter wasn’t alone, as the media created a false narrative in an attempt to sabotage 𝕏 as a threat. Here’s a few examples: 1. Elon Musk’s takeover of Twitter will destroy freedom of speech, not protect it - Market Watch Elon reinstated many banned accounts for practicing free speech, including: - President Trump (Banned after Jan 6) - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (Banned for discussing COVID) - Babylon Bee (Banned for making a transgender joke) - ALX (Banned for questioning mask mandates) - The Krassenstein Twins (scapegoat) Since then, Elon has implemented MANY changes to defend free speech and mitigate hate speech on the platform. He also sued anyone that tried to stifle free speech, including CALIFORNIA 2 days ago! 2. Twitter Users Flock to Other Platforms as the Elon Era Begins - Wired In November, @elonmusk shared that “signups were averaging over two million per day in the last seven days, up 66% compared to the same week in 2021”. In March, he posted, “This platform is growing fast! [We] just exceeded 8 billion user-minutes per day.” Even after they released this data, a CNN article said: “Elon Musk has officially killed Twitter. The zombie platform lives on as X, a disfigured shell of its former self.” They REFUSE to accept they were wrong! Meanwhile, Meta’s Twitter competitor died within weeks. 3. Elon Musk just blew up Twitter verification and will destroy Twitter in the process - Techradar This attack stopped as soon as Insta copied the strategy 😂 MY THOUGHTS: 1. Record numbers 2. Transparent 3. Driven team 4. Innovating faster than ever 5. Free Speech revived The above are based on facts. What will the media use next to attack 𝕏?

WHY IS CNN ATTACKING ELON AGAIN? | EXPOSING HIDDEN AGENDAS Tapper tried to corner Blinken to criticize Musk, and it failed. Now, he tries the same strategy with Nikki Haley, and it flops again. I start to wonder, why is CNN so adamant on attacking Elon? Then I see some of their past headlines: - Elon Musk is the gift that keeps on giving to Mark Zuckerberg. - How Elon Musk upended Twitter and his own reputation in 6 months as CEO. - Linda Yaccarino was pressed about the chaos on Elon Musk’s X. Her answers were detached from reality. - ADL chief fires back at Elon Musk for waging campaign of harassment against the group. - Twitter’s rebrand is the next stage in @elonmusk's vision for the company. But does anyone want it? Their belief is that by repeating the same false news often enough, people will come to believe it. However, they fail to comprehend that we now have alternative media such as 𝕏 exposing their falsehoods. Is Tapper deliberately lying, or is he ignorant of the fact that he's spreading misinformation?

Biggest Anti-Vax Athlete In The World Wins Moderna-Sponsored US Open Title Novak Djokovic, who got kicked out of the U.S Open last year for not being vaccinated, won the US Open Title today as well as the ‘Shot of the Day’, which are sponsored by Moderna😂 The irony is too real

BREAKING: HAWAII'S KILAUEA VOLCANO ERPUTS! Alert Level Elevated To Warning The Kilauea Volcano in Hawaii, one of the world's most active volcanoes, has started erupting, unleashing lava fountains inside its crater. The USGS has given a red alert for Kilauea due to the emission of hazardous volcanic gases and ongoing lava activities. Authorities indicate that a series of recent earthquakes prompted this eruption. Currently, there's no danger to the public. Standby for more updates!

THEY WILL ASSASSINATE TRUMP! Tucker Carlson said: “We're speeding towards assassination, obviously!" He listed EVERYTHING they have done to try to stop Trump: 1) Protested him 2) Called him names 3) Impeached him TWICE 4) Fabricated lies about Jan 6 against Trump 5) Indicted him FOUR times! And STILL, Trump's popularity has increased! Both sides have decided that he is SO THREATENING that they can't have him. I don't think he'll be assassinated, at least not by his opponents, however I agree that everything they've done so far seems to just make him more popular. Do you think 'they' will assassinate Trump?

CNN ATTACKS ELON | BLINKEN'S REPLY WILL SHOCK YOU CNN has asked for ‘repercussions’ against Elon, saying he ‘sabotaged a military operation by Ukraine.’ I’m not making this up... Elon refuses to directly participate in a war, and CNN calls it ‘sabotage' 😂 It gets worse… US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken responds to CNN’s Jake Tapper by ignoring his allegations and pointing out the BENEFITS Starlink brought the Ukrainian people! Tapper dismisses Blinken’s reply, since it doesn’t criticize Elon, and moves to a new stupid agenda: Elon’s ‘secret talks’ with the Senior Russian Officials, claiming Elon is doing his own “diplomatic outreach to the Russian Government.” Blinken AGAIN ignores the stupid question and AGAIN highlights how important and impactful Starlink has been to Ukraine. And guess how Tapper wraps up the interview? “It sounds like Starlink's so important the US government doesn't want to risk offending a capricious billionaire.” WHAT?! Biden’s administration has a history of attacking Elon: There are already multiple bogus investigations against his companies ongoing right now. Remember last week’s secret ‘glass house’ that the DOJ and SEC are apparently investigating? 😂 How about X getting fined for refusing to hand over Trump’s personal Twitter data and information to prosecutors? Or SpaceX getting sued by the DOJ for hiring Americans in the company’s hiring process? (not making this up!) CNN, feel free to hate @elonmusk, but try to be more subtle about it...

NYC MIGRANT CRISIS | EXPOSING MAYOR'S 180 DEGREE TURN Mayor Eric Adams WELCOMED migrants for months, but now decries a migrant crisis that 'will destroy the city." What happed? Why the change? In Spring 2022, Adams proudly declared NYC as a 'shelter state.' However, his tune has changed since buses carrying around 110,000 asylum seekers arrived. Now Adams has asked a judge to suspend the Right to Shelter policy and has initiated a plan to distribute flyers at the US-Mexico border telling newly arrived migrants to 'consider another city.' We must remember that the economy needs immigrants: 1. In 2016, immigrants added $2 trillion to the U.S. GDP. 2. In 2018, they contributed $458.7 billion to state, local, and federal taxes. 3. Immigrants also have $1.3 trillion in spending power and can help fill labor demand and maintain the social safety net as more Americans retire. 4. Between 2010 and 2019, foreign-born workers accounted for up to one-quarter of employment growth and up to three-quarters of the growth in business establishments. 5. Skilled immigrants generated 30% to 50% of total U.S. productivity growth between 1990 and 2010 6. Immigrants pay more than $90 billion in taxes yearly and receive only $5 billion in welfare. Should other cities step up and help by accepting some of these immigrants? Is blaming immigration becoming a scapegoat for political failures? Or should we simply close the borders?

NFL SUNDAY GAMES SPACE - PREVIEW & ANALYSIS (LIVE in 2 hours) The NFL season is in full swing, and we're bringing it LIVE TO TWITTER! Journalists and passionate fans are gathering live to dissect every game, share their thoughts, and ignite the discussions. At 6pm EST, we're kicking off a Twitter Space that will have you primed and ready for tomorrow's NFL showdowns and betting lines. We're not just fans; we're your NFL game day guides! And here's a special shout-out to our sponsor, @TeamBookiebot! They've made betting on your favorite teams this weekend a breeze. Try it out, and make your game day even more thrilling. Join us in the conversation, and let's make this NFL season unforgettable together. LINK IN THE COMMENTS!

MEDIA ATTACKS ELON FOR PREVENTING POSSIBLE NUCLEAR WAR First, the media attacked Elon over ADL, and now it’s his REFUSAL to escalate the Ukraine war. 1. Elon Musk ‘committed evil’ with Starlink order, says Ukrainian official - The Guardian Please explain how preventing the escalation of a war with the country with the most nuclear warheads is ‘evil’! Read the quotes below and tell me: Do you think it is better for the world and humanity if a U.S. private company facilitated a major attack on Russia’s fleet in Crimea? Blinken: Crimea a ‘red line’ for Putin Putin: Russia would use nuclear weapons if it felt its "vital interests" were threatened Medvedev: “If it comes to nuclear weapons, there will have to be a preemptive strike." Putin: Russia's nuclear weapons were "not just a deterrent, but also a means of ensuring Russia's security." So the Government literally asked Elon to cross a ‘RED LINE’ with the President of a country that has threatened on many occasions to use Nuclear weapons. I fail to understand how the media can twist this into a bad thing! 2. Ukraine is furious with Elon Musk for thwarting an attack on Russia's navy - NBC No NBC, you do not speak for MILLIONS of Ukrainians using Starlink to communicate for FREE, costing Starlink $80 million while the country’s internet infrastructure was in utter ruin. 3. Ukraine rips Elon Musk for disrupting sneak attack on Russian fleet with Starlink cutoff - CNBC Ukraine rips Elon? The country uses Starlink for free! And Starling’s terms of service are clear: “Our terms of service clearly prohibit Starlink for offensive military action, as we are a civilian system, so they were again asking for something that was expressly prohibited.” - Elon. 4. Elon Musk sabotaged Ukrainian attack on Russian fleet in Crimea by turning off Starlink, new book says - Politico @elonmusk said it himself: The "Starlink regions in question were not activated. SpaceX did not deactivate anything." and "At no point did I or anyone at SpaceX promise coverage over Crimea." The book's author confirmed this: “The Ukrainians THOUGHT coverage was enabled all the way to Crimea, but it was not. They asked Musk to enable it for their drone sub attack on the Russian fleet. Musk did not enable it, because he thought, probably correctly, that would cause a major war.” 5. U.S. Gov can't allow Musk the power to intervene in wars - The Daily Beast So the guy you asked to intervene and refused should not be allowed to intervene? The irony😂 MY THOUGHTS: The fact that the US Government openly called Crimea a ‘Red Line’ for Putin, yet a U.S. private company was requested to participate in crossing that line, is MIND BOGGLING. Governments should be the ones trying to save lives and de-escalate wars, not keep them going! Instead, we have a private company de-escalating while the Government is trying to do the opposite. And on top of this, the media attacks the de-escalating party and supports the ones escalating. Does anyone want this war to end??? And does mainstream media even care about the truth anymore?

On my quest to live forever. Do you want to join? t.co/NdeNbjDtvt

ADL-BACKED MEDIA ATTACKS ELON MUSK As usual, the media is on the attack against Elon. Let’s debunk some of these headlines: 1. Elon Musk claims to be ‘against antisemitism of any kind,’ but has done precious little to prove it - Fortune Precious little? Since Elon took over, an independent research firm found that “more than 99% of content users and advertisers see on Twitter is healthy,” and they estimated social media hate speech impressions “to be 0.003% compared to Twitter’s estimate of 0.012%.” 2. Elon Musk Blames ADL for Destroying Website He Ruined Himself - Rolling Stone They say Elon destroyed 𝕏, yet all the metrics show the platform is breaking records (Monthly Users, User Minutes Per Day, Video Views) 3. Civil rights groups attacked by Elon Musk are mounting a counter-offensive - NBC 'Civil rights groups' 😂 4. Elon Musk’s Latest Target Hits Back - The Atlantic Ironic how they call Elon the target, when the ADL ADMITTED to pressuring advertisers FOR MONTHS to leave 𝕏, dropping advertising revenue by 60%. @elonmusk finally hits back, yet somehow the ADL became the target and they are hitting back? 😂 I don’t know what’s stronger, mainstream media’s HATE FOR ELON, or their LOVE FOR THE ADL?

🚨 BREAKING: ELON SUES CALIFORNIA FOR CENSORSHIP 𝕏 has taken legal action against California, challenging a law that mandates social media platforms to disclose their content removal policies, especially concerning hate speech, misinformation, and harassment. This unique legislation, endorsed by California Gov. Gavin Newsom last year, is now under scrutiny by X Corp. for potentially infringing on First Amendment rights. While Assembly Bill 587 demands platforms to be transparent about their moderation policies and submit biannual reports, 𝕏 Corp. argues in its lawsuit that the law forces companies into unwanted speech and pressures them to limit or demonetize content that is constitutionally protected. The case has been filed in the Eastern District Court of California. Do you support 𝕏 and @Elonmusk in this fight?

🚨 BREAKING: NEW CALIFORNIA LAW CAN TAKE YOUR TRANSGENDER KIDS The California State Assembly just passed a bill proposing a new law requiring judges to consider a parent's affirmation of their child's identity in custody cases. WHAT DOES THIS MEAN? If a parent refuses to accept their child's gender transition, they could LOSE CUSTODY of that child! The child would go to the parent that agrees with the gender transition. Governor Gavin Newsom has until Oct. 14 to sign or veto the bill.

🚨 BREAKING: California has become the first State to recognize 'Transgender History Month' “Let’s lift up the history of the transgender Californians who left their mark on our great state.” - The bill’s author, Matt Haney Will other States follow suit? What's next?

ADL BANNING TRUMP FROM TWITTER: Election Interference? After months of pressure from the ADL, the President of the most powerful nation in the world was banned from Twitter. Yes, the same ADL that CEO Jonathan Greenblatt wants us to think is a ‘small non for profit in NY’. WHAT HAPPENED? During the 2016 presidential campaign, the ADL frequently criticized Trump for allegedly using antisemitic narratives and promoting divisive rhetoric. Even after his election, the ADL continued to challenge Trump for seemingly endorsing extremists like white supremacists, exploiting antisemitism for political gain, and perpetuating antisemitic stereotypes. They even called for his removal from office after January 6. He was banned within days. The ADL and the Stop Hate for Profit coalition, co-founded by the ADL, urged ALL social media platforms to #'BanTrumpSaveDemocracy' and permanently remove him from their platforms by January 20. They also pushed for brands and companies to withdraw advertising on these social media networks until Trump is PERMANENTLY banned from these platforms. Remember how Greenblatt claimed 2 days ago that the ADL was ‘not out there publicly or privately talking to advertisers’? This illustrates the power and influence of the ADL. MY THOUGHTS: I’m trying to give the ADL the benefit of the doubt, as I greatly respect their mission statement and what they stand for. However, the amount of power and influence they possess under Greenblatt, and the way they use it, should not be acceptable in any democracy. They can and did silence the President of the most powerful country in the world. They can and did financially cripple Facebook and 𝕏, two of the largest social media platforms. Do not be deceived when they refer to themselves as "a small non-profit out of New York." They are a behemoth, using their mission statement to stifle free speech. I don’t advocate banning the ADL, however change is needed. If that does not happen, then the ADL will naturally cease to exist as more people realize what’s truly happening behind the scenes. Should all social media platforms join @elonmusk against the ADL?

🚨 BREAKING: ELON DEBUNKS CNN | PREVENTS POTENTIAL NUCLEAR CONFLICT Elon just confirmed the U.S or Ukrainian Government requested him to play a significant role in a MAJOR ESCALATION in the Ukraine war. CNN reported that Elon deactivated his Starlink satellites in response to a covert attack the Ukrainians were planning on the Russian naval fleet. They were WRONG! Elon clarified the satellites were NOT active, and that he was pressured by the Government to activate them so that Ukraine can attack Russian ships in a contentious territory. “There was an emergency request from government authorities to activate Starlink all the way to Sevastopol. The obvious intent being to sink most of the Russian fleet at anchor.” @elonmusk refused to activate Starlink, avoiding “a major act of war and conflict escalation.” So not only are Governments not deescalating the war, but they have also actively tried to drag a private company to play a role in ESCALATING. This is NOT how peace will be reached!

ELON PREVENTS NUCLEAR WAR? Elon Musk covertly instructed his engineers to deactivate Starlink's satellite communications network during a MAJOR Ukrainian offensive. This action was taken to intentionally thwart a surprise attack by Ukraine against the Russian naval fleet. The Ukrainian submarine drones, armed with explosives, mysteriously lost connectivity as they advanced towards the Russian warships. Now we know that Musk intentionally deactivated Starlink. Ukrainian officials pleaded for the reactivation of the satellites, however Musk was concerned the attack could trigger a nuclear response from Russia. This fear was not baseless, as Musk had open discussions with high-ranking Russian officials not long before the attack. I’ve posted heavily about the dangerous rhetoric from Russia relating to a possible Nuclear attack on Ukraine, with Crimea being considered a Red Line. No matter which side of the war you’re on, we all want to avoid a nuclear conflict, and @elonmusk’s actions may have prevented just that. Do you think Elon did the right thing?

EXPOSED: ADL’S HISTORY OF GETTING SUED & NEVER ADMITTING WRONGDOING Elon will likely file a lawsuit against the ADL “to clear our platform’s name on the matter of anti-Semitism.” The ADL isn't a stranger to the courtroom, and their track record is concerning: 1. ADL v. Civil Rights Groups In 1993, the ADL was sued by civil rights groups representing Arab Americans and African Americans for allegedly hiring agents to gather secret information on them. They reached a settlement to pay $175,000 toward the plaintiffs’ legal fees and to establish a $25,000 community relations fund for programs to facilitate improved relations between and among Arab American, Jewish, African American, and other minority communities in the US. RESULT: The ADL did not admit wrongdoing but agreed to a restraining injunction barring ADL from obtaining information from state employees, which is forbidden by law to disclose. 2. William Quigley and Anne Quigley v. Rosenthal This was their last true loss. In 2000 when a judge in Colorado fined the ADL $10.5 million in a defamation suit. William and Anne Quigley were accused of anti-Semitic behavior by their neighbors, Mitchell and Candice Aronson. The Aronsons recorded the Quigleys' conversations without their consent and gave the recordings to the ADL, which then publicly accused the Quigleys of hate crimes. In response, the Quigleys sued the ADL and its regional director, Saul Rosenthal, for defamation. In 2000, a Denver jury ruled in favor of the Quigleys, finding that the ADL had defamed them. The ADL appealed the verdict, but the appeals court upheld the ruling. RESULT: The ADL eventually paid the $10.5 million fine plus interest in 2004 but never admitted any wrongdoing. This was a major setback for the ADL. MY THOUGHTS: As you can see in both examples above, the ADL DID NOT ADMIT WRONGDOING, despite paying hefty sums of money and having to face penalties such as a restraining injunction. How can the ADL never admit guilt? Also, should other social media platforms join @ElonMusk’s lawsuit? Remember that Zuckerberg was HEAVILY pressured by the ADL in 2021, also losing substantial amounts of money before caving!