🇺🇸🇮🇷 The next war with Iran could become something much bigger than Trump intends
I spoke with Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson about the growing American military buildup around Iran, and he made a comparison I found particularly disturbing.
Europe in 1914.
Back then, governments believed they could enter a war, achieve their objectives and return home within months.
Instead, they unleashed a conflict that destroyed empires.
Wilkerson sees a similar danger developing today, particularly as France reportedly deploys troops to Saudi Arabia and more countries become involved in the Middle East.
We discussed Trump's apparent interest in using the MOAB against Iranian targets.
Wilkerson argues that these enormous bombs would accomplish very little against Iran's deeply buried nuclear facilities. He also doubts the U.S. has enough conventional military capability remaining to force a decisive outcome.
That leaves a troubling question.
What happens if Trump launches another attack, Iran refuses to concede, and Washington finds itself facing an even worse strategic position?
Wilkerson worries that the pressure to escalate could eventually bring nuclear weapons into the equation.
And his concern extends beyond Iran.
We also discussed Ukraine, where he believes Putin has become increasingly committed to achieving his objectives, making a compromise more difficult as the human and political costs accumulate.
What struck me was his broader argument about how wars develop.
Leaders enter conflicts believing they can control the outcome. Then the casualties mount, the objectives expand, and accepting anything short of victory becomes politically impossible.
Wilkerson fears we're approaching precisely that kind of situation, with nuclear weapons now part of the equation.
The danger isn't that anyone necessarily wants a world war. It's that several governments could make decisions that eventually leave them unable to avoid one.
💬 28🔁 68
♥ 413👁 271K
Top reply · ♥ 1
Brad Ellis @XrpEllis ·
↗
@MarioNawfal Its amazing how everyone else sees 9/11 as a false flag inside job based on facts and evidence but the colonel doesn't see it. Puts doubts on everything else he has to say












































































