S.B.S

Here is a clear ToS violation. @diana_bloom_ posted the exact same reply to Reuters 10 times in 143 seconds. Then she admits the tactic herself: "we flood their comment sections every time." That is platform manipulation. t.co/UBagOl4Szx

Here are 576 of @EliAfriatISR repetitive posts. First pic is the same post 144 times. Each recycled dozens of times, almost all at exactly :00 seconds. Thats not a person, thats a scheduler running copypasta. Combined, these racked up 149.9 million views. When will X fix this? t.co/q8Fzoxxix2

lmao. t.co/ocQH4AbAfZ

Next @VividProwess post, dropping in 1 minutes: pro-Israel content, video attached. Screenshot this.

When Elon open sourced X's algorithm, he said X was "actively seeking criticism to improve fairness and quality of algorithmic recommendations." Here is some. Every reaction has a price: Like +0.5 Reply +5 Block -31.2 Mute -58.8 Report -234 But the code also shows the abuse system is not applied equally. X's AI safety pipeline tags targeted insults with FOSNR_ABUSE_INSULTS, which hides the post from recommendations. Accounts labeled High PageRank are skipped. Their posts are not even scanned. They are automatically immune to X's own detection model. I checked 7,992 of Eitan Fischberger's archived posts. 406 attack named people, "sick freak", "evil witch", "piece of human garbage". No sign any were hidden. They do BETTER than his normal posts. Are accounts like Fischberger classified as High PageRank? Because the code is clear about everyone else: post these exact insults as a regular account, or reply to him in kind, and the model can scan you, label you, and limit your reach. He may never be scanned at all. One rule for some, another for everyone else. Why?

According to X’s publicly released open source code, its copypasta rule is not applied equally. Its duplicate text system can give posts a COPYPASTA_SPAM label. But accounts classified as “High PageRank” are skipped by this rule. Archived posts show: Dr. Maalouf 902 different content sets reused in 1,922 later posts Eyal Yakoby 1,365 different content sets reused in 3,412 later posts VividProwess 294 different content sets reused in 431 later posts within the sample X does not disclose whether these three are classified as High PageRank. What the archives do show is thousands of reruns across hundreds of recurring sets. Are these reruns going undetected, or are they being detected and then skipped because the accounts fall under the High PageRank exception? If so, why?

It was number 6 lol: “Islam taking over the West.” He recycled the video and still got the country wrong. Copypasta with bad info. t.co/whk2zKb61O

Called when his next post would go up. Nailed it. Called the one after that too. Then he blocked me. Hopefully the script's off for now. t.co/o1FmBd8XZ2

lmao. t.co/zq0T51evP7

About 30 minutes from now, Dr. Maalouf will probably make another post.

A certain account will post in the next 15 min. Last drop 1:08pm ET. Same thing all day: short video, two-line caption. The closer will be one of these: 1. “I will never find this normal.” 2. “Sorry, no one can convince me this is normal. It’s medieval.”

AI Community Notes are surprisingly good at recognizing context manipulation and lies. Wonderful addition to X. t.co/eFs2HMkbjp

אתה מדבר עברית? t.co/ZCpHrk7vRS

Eyal Yakoby top topics. 55,889 posts (retweets excluded). The full breakdown below. t.co/0iRfK19Owd

okay??? t.co/iKChrffwh9

X's rules bar repeatedly posting nearly identical content ("copypasta"). Eyal Yakoby ran the same "Silent." template 266x since the June 2025 war. Only the headline and image change. The copy-pasted names: Cenk Uygur 135x Mehdi Hasan 130x Ana Kasparian 110x t.co/Zz7MqZZI7x

The more this recycled spam takes over, the worse X gets for everyone. t.co/iEFjRydxNH

Ran the numbers. @nosoup4knowles has mentioned Candace → 5,165 times. @RealCandaceO has mentioned Erika Kirk → 266 times. That’s a 1,842% gap.

Across the 9,951 posts on the @realMaalouf account, 19% are exact re-uploads of his own older posts. 33% of the media, with copies disguised by swapped words. His recycled library: 902 distinct posts, some reused up to 18 times. t.co/cgL8MGzZia

It’s not hard to enforce X’s ToS against two more people when you’re already enforcing it incorrectly against everyone except them.

Stop. t.co/lQoFaWSLwl

Copypasta on a schedule. @VividProwess posts the same lines over and over, dropped on exactly :00 and exactly :30 to the second, thousands of times. That is duplicate content on a timer, not organic posting. Top of the hour left, half hour right. t.co/thAt5lw6GZ

Oh, we lived and breathed the product. The one where accounts can post the same photo with the same caption 17 times. Rerun content on 119 of 120 days. Rack up 3,412 identical re-uploads while the copypasta policy just watches. That is the product you left us with.

So, @nosoup4knowles mentions of Candace Owens: Before Charlie Kirk’s death (2020–2025): 1,125 After his death (2025–2026): 4,040 That’s 5 years compared to just 11 months, excluding reposts and deleted tweets.

Eyal Yakoby recycles the same content on a loop. The same photo, a near-identical caption, uploaded again like it's the first time. X has a name for this: Copypasta. 4 of these posts below, with how many times each one went up. t.co/rT698ZhKQ2

June 2024: 'I'd like to sponsor a vacation to Gaza or Iran, their choice.' August 2026: he's one of the people taking over product at X. Somewhere in between: he deleted it. t.co/ASRpc68Tgq

Eyal Yakoby posted about Hamas 7,000 times. To recap: Israel 7,000 times, Iran 7,000 times, and Hamas 7,000 times. That’s 21,000 in total from one account. More than once every hour. t.co/oDiuCDILop

Eyal Yakoby posting about Iran 7,000 times. In one day alone, he wrote Iran 188 times. That’s once every 8 minutes. t.co/8wv6D6JlR4

Eyal Yakoby posting about Israel $7,000 times. t.co/Xm4bFDTw59