🇺🇦🇷🇺 Philip Pilkington thinks Trump’s push for an energy ceasefire in Ukraine is about more than protecting infrastructure.
He believes Russia’s winter strategy is to make major Ukrainian cities increasingly difficult to live in, potentially driving another wave of migration into Europe.
At the same time, Trump has been pressuring Zelensky to stop Ukrainian strikes on Russian energy targets.
Pilkington sees a political calculation in that too.
If shortages worsen before the midterms, Trump needs someone else to blame.
“Trump also needs a bad guy for the midterms to blame the diesel shortages on, and Zelenskyy is perfect for that.”
What makes this more interesting is that the interview itself pushed back on one of Pilkington’s claims: Zelensky’s approval is not around 5%, with cited polling putting it much higher.
So the broader argument may be worth examining, but some of the political assumptions underneath it clearly deserve more scrutiny.
@philippilk
💬 28🔁 49
♥ 337👁 58K
Top reply · ♥ 12
IronHorsey 🇺🇸 @IronHorsey2000 ·
↗
@MarioNawfal This guy is half retarded. Deflection on diesel, of course, but this guy sees little. Ukraine knows what it’s up against after almost five years of Putin’s War. Not this dweeb.





































